MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154591940 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1998.744756

Stretch reflex behavior of spastic ankle under passive and active conditions

2002· article· en· W2154591940 on OpenAlexaff
M.M. Mirbagheri, Robert E. Kearney, H. Barbeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsReflexSpasticAnkleStretch reflexAnkle jerk reflexPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicineH-reflexReciprocal inhibitionInhibitory postsynaptic potentialAnatomyAnesthesiaInternal medicineCerebral palsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A parallel-cascade system identification method was used to measure dynamic ankle stiffness in normal and spastic spinal cord injured (SCI) subjects. Modulation of reflex stiffness gain of the ankle extensor muscles (GS) was studied by applying perturbations to the ankle at different positions under passive (relaxed) and active (10% extensor maximum voluntary contraction) conditions. In SCI subjects: (1) modulation of reflex gain with ankle position was abnormal in both passive and active conditions; (2) reflex stiffness gain was always significantly higher than in normal subjects; (3) reflex gain was similar under active and passive conditions except at plantarflexion where reflex gain was slightly higher under active conditions; (4) the reflex latency was shorter. The findings demonstrate that the reflex mechanics are abnormal in SCI spastic patients. The abnormalities are likely due not only to a decrease in presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms but also to a disruption in the motoneuron recruitment order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207