MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154596034 · doi:10.1680/grim.2002.6.4.145

Feasibility assessment of electro-osmotic consolidation on marine sediment

2002· article· en· W2154596034 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsolidation (business)Void ratioHydraulic conductivityGeotechnical engineeringSoil waterPore water pressureGeologySoil sciencePermeability (electromagnetism)Environmental scienceChemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A procedure is developed for the feasibility assessment of electro-osmotic (EO) consolidation of geomaterials, including fine-grained soils, sediments and mine tailings containing clay minerals. The assessment is based on a series of parametric studies to examine the effectiveness and efficiency of the electro-osmotic process in a site-specific geomaterial. The feasibility study on a natural marine sediment recovered from the seabed of the Korean coast is presented to illustrate steps involved in the assessment. In particular, the effects of soil pore fluid salinity and void ratio on electro-osmotic consolidation using intermittent current are examined. The results show that the effectiveness of electro-osmotic consolidation, assessed by the EO permeability ratio, increases when the soil void ratio decreases, whereas it is not significantly affected by the pore fluid salinity. The study also illustrates that the power consumption in an electro-osmotic consolidation process is predominantly controlled by the electrical conductivity of the soil, which is a function of the soil pore fluid salinity and void ratio. Une procédure est développée pour l'évaluation de la faisabilité de la consolidation électro-osmotique (EO) des géomatériaux incluant les sols granulaires fins, les sédiments et les résidus miniers. L'évaluation est basée sur une série d'études paramétriques pour examiner l'efficacité et l'efficience du processus électro-osmotique dans un géomatériau spécifique. On présente l'étude de l'efficacité sur sédiment marin naturel provenant d'un fond marin de la cote coréenne pour illustrer les é tapes comprises dans l'évaluation. On examine, en particulier, les effets de la salinité de l'eau interstitielle et de l'indice des vides sur la consolidation électro-osmotique en utilisant le courant intermittent. Les résultats montrent que l'efficacité consolidation électro-osmotique, évaluée par le rapport de permeéabilité EO, augmente quand l'indice des vides du sol décroît tandis qu'elle n'est pas affectée de façon significative par la salinité de l'eau interstitielle. L'étude illustre aussi que la consommation de puissance dans un processus de consolidation électro-osmotique est principalement contrôlée par la conductivité é lectrique du sol qui est une fonction salinité de l'eau interstitielle et de l'indice des vides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.763

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it