MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154605340 · doi:10.1117/12.470639

Bimetallic thermal activated films for microfabrication, photomasks, and data storage

2002· article· en· W2154605340 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Tu, Glenn H. Chapman, Marinko V. Šarunic

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrofabricationPhotomaskBimetallic stripMaterials scienceNanotechnologyResistMetallurgyFabrication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bimetallic thermal resist Bi/In has shown many applications in the areas of microfabrication, photomasks and data storage. Optical modeling shows that this class of thermal resist is wavelength invariant, and Bi/In can perform even better at 13.4 nm than at 248 nm due to the increase of absorption and the reduction of reflection. Images were successfully made on Bi/In films with both proximity and projection exposures with Nd:YAG laser running at 2nd harmonic wavelength. A new kind of developing solution used at room temperature was found to be more effective in descumming than nitric acetic acid solution. Both have the etching selectively of unexposed area to exposed areas > 60:1. Developed Bi/In resists shows good conductivity, which can be used as both a metal plating masking and seeding layer, 2 to 10 micrometers wide CU and Ni lines and squares were successfully plated on the developed Bi/In patterns on glass slides and silicon wafers. Shelf test shows that the properties of Bi/In film do not change after being kept in a humid temperature-lifted environment for 10 days. Large optical transmission changes indicate Bi/In can be used for direct-write photomasks and data storage media. Heat- treatment enhances the OD exposed/unexposed OD change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207