The impact of pulmonary valve replacement after tetralogy of Fallot repair: a matched comparison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: While there are no controlled studies, pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) after late tetralogy of Fallot repair is performed for patients with symptoms, arrhythmia or ventricular dysfunction. We sought to determine the impact of PVR on clinical outcomes. METHODS: In a matched cohort study, 82 patients with PVR after tetralogy of Fallot repair without a history of ventricular arrhythmia were matched and compared with similarly followed non-PVR control subjects. A propensity-score adjusted analysis using repeated measures regression techniques was performed. RESULTS: For the PVR subjects, the mean age was 28 years with a mean duration follow-up of 9 years. Before PVR, these subjects were significantly more likely than matched non-PVR subjects to have had non-ventricular arrhythmias, symptoms, lower functional class, longer QRS duration, lower right ventricular ejection fraction and higher right ventricular pressure, and reduced exercise duration but not aerobic capacity. During follow-up, sudden death occurred in four non-PVR subjects compared with no PVR subjects, with three episodes of ventricular tachycardia in the PVR subjects versus none in the non-PVR subjects (p=0.49). Symptoms and functional class improved in the PVR subjects with no change in the non-PVR subjects (p<0.001). The change in QRS duration was not significantly different between PVR and non-PVR subjects (p=0.48). Oxygen consumption at peak exercise did not significantly change in either group. For PVR subjects, there was a significant qualitative reduction in pulmonary (p<0.001) and tricuspid valve regurgitation (p=0.009) and right ventricular size (p<0.001) and dysfunction (p<0.001) noted on echocardiography. CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms and functional status are improved after late PVR, with a reduction in pulmonary and tricuspid valve regurgitation and right ventricular size and dysfunction. While a significant impact on arrhythmia was not detected, there were no sudden deaths in the PVR subjects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".