Epidemiology of Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis in a Canadian Surveyed Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: limited data are available on the epidemiologic features of psoriasis in Canada. OBJECTIVE: to investigate the epidemiologic features and burden of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in a Canadian population. METHODS: an online survey was conducted using a consumer panel. Eligible respondents indicated a diagnosis of psoriasis and plaque-type psoriasis of at least moderate severity. Eligibility was validated according to self-reported body surface area (BSA) involvement, sensitive areas affected, and/or current treatment. RESULTS: of the 514 respondents who completed the survey, 62% estimated a BSA involvement of >/= 3% within the past 5 years. Onset of psoriasis occurred earlier in females than in males. Nail involvement was more commonly reported in individuals with psoriatic arthritis compared to those without. Several symptoms were more likely described as "constantly" or "near constantly" experienced by females than by males. Comorbidities commonly reported were hypertension, dyslipidemia, and overweight or obesity. CONCLUSIONS: the findings are consistent with a substantial burden attributed to moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a Canadian population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".