The collaborative role of molecular conformation and energetics in the binding of gas-phase non-covalent polymer/amine complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A large series of similar non-covalent complexes were probed using ion mobility spectrometry, molecular mechanics/molecular dynamics (MM/MD), electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) and RRKM theory in order to determine the effects of charge state and charge location upon the conformation, the 0 K activation energy (E(0)) and the entropy of activation (ΔS(‡)) of the dissociation of these complexes. The non-covalent complexes consisted of poly(methylmethacrylate) oligomers and singly and doubly charged diaminoalkanes of varying length. This allowed for control of the charge separation within the complexes, as well as the size of the complex. A destabilizing effect was observed in complexes containing protons in close proximity, and/or short oligomers. Interestingly, a multiple charge stabilizing effect was observed when charge sites were sufficiently separated and/or when the polymer moiety of the complex was large. ΔS(‡) values of doubly charged complexes showed a greater increase with increasing polymer size in comparison to singly charged complexes. This entropic observation is explained by structure, where IMS and MM/MD determined that the charge location was the determining factor of the overall conformation of these complexes and multiple charging resulted in more rigid arrangements. Dissociation of a tightly bound complex is more entropically favorable than a loosely bound complex. Also presented is a MM/MD refinement regime derived from IMS measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".