Ozone photolysis: Strong isotopologue/isotopomer selectivity in the stratosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We calculated the photolysis rate coefficients of five ozone isotopologues/isotopomers as functions of altitude up to 80 km using recent ab initio absorption cross sections and an averaged actinic flux. Three of the five ozone isotopologues/isotopomers are symmetric, with a single isotopic dissociation channel, and two are asymmetric with two isotopic dissociation channels. The specific contributions of the Chappuis, Huggins, and Hartley bands to the photolysis rates and enrichments have been determined as a function of altitude. The Chappuis and Hartley bands have a dominant contribution to the photolysis rates, respectively at low and high altitudes, but these two bands are characterized by small fractionations. In contrast, the Huggins band has a minor contribution to the overall photolysis rate at any altitude, but it generates most of the strong fractionation which peaks around 35 km. The photolysis fractionations are “mass dependent” in contrast with those due to the ozone formation process which are “non–mass dependent.” The altitude dependences of our photolysis fractionations are in qualitative agreement with those of Liang et al. (2006) but differ quantitatively, most notably because the contribution of the Huggins band has been reevaluated. The branching ratio between the two electronic dissociation channels (either O( 3 P) or O( 1 D) products) has been used to calculate the isotopic enrichments of the reactive O( 1 D) induced by ozone photolysis. The isotopic photolysis rates can be included in a global kinetic model that includes ozone formation processes and collision with O 2 and other oxygen‐containing species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".