MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2154969005 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2006.525

P3E-3 Finite Element Modeling of Ultrasound Scattering by Spherical Objects and Cells

2006· article· en· W2154969005 on OpenAlexaff
Michael C. Kolios, Omar Falou, J. Carl Kumaradas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiphysicsScatteringFinite element methodBackscatter (email)PhysicsAcousticsBoundary value problemUltrasoundStiffnessSpherical shellPhysical acousticsSPHERESBoundary element methodShell (structure)MechanicsComputational physicsClassical mechanicsOpticsAcoustic waveMaterials scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown that high-frequency ultrasound (20 MHz-60 MHz) can be used to detect structural and physical changes in tissues and cell ensembles during cell death. However, the changes observed are not well understood. Recent theoretical models treating the cell as a homogeneous sphere did not show good agreement with experimental data. We have recently developed a finite element model of wave propagation through inhomogeneous spherical structures (COMSOL Multiphysics, COMSOL Inc., Burlington, MA) to solve the problem of high-frequency acoustic scattering from cells. We will discuss the improvement to our previous model by using a second-order boundary condition. The improved model predicts scattering by a homogeneous sphere with a 2% average accuracy when compared to the Faran model. Applications of the model to ultrasound scattering by two types of objects that represent biological cells will be presented. In both applications the cell is a sphere (representing the nucleus) surrounded by a spherical shell (representing the cytoplasm). The cytoplasm has either an elastic property with a stiffness less than that of the nucleus, or is fluid, having similar physical properties to water. The deformations of an air-filled microbubble subject to various acoustic wave frequencies will also be presented. Finally, the significance of this work on the prediction of ultrasound backscatter from cells, and on ultrasound tissue characterization techniques will be discussed

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207