Evaluation of Insecticides for Control of Overwintering Hylurgopinus rufipes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A bark disk bioassay was used to assess the effectiveness of different insecticides for control of overwintering adult native elm bark beetles, Hylurgopinus rufipes (Eichoff) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Insecticides were applied to the base of the trunks of living American elm trees, Ulmus americana L., and bark disk samples were removed at intervals with a hole saw. Adult H. rufipes were exposed in bioassay chambers for which the bark disks formed the floor of the chamber. In September 2005, chlorpyrifos, permethrin, and a water control were applied to trees in five replicated blocks, and bark disk samples were taken at intervals over the following 725 d. In September 2006, chlorpyrifos, permethrin, carbaryl, bifenthrin, and a water control were applied to trees in six replicated blocks, and disk samples were removed at intervals up to 1,163 d after application. In both experiments, beetle mortality was 100% on chlorpyrifos-treated disks removed up to 725 d after treatment and, in the 2006 trial, declined thereafter. The pattern of mortality in the bifenthrin treatment did not differ significantly from that in the chlorpyrifos treatment in the 2006 experiment. Average corrected mortality on disks treated with permethrin or carbaryl declined below 100% by 11 d after application. On disks removed in the May following treatment, 248 d after application, average corrected mortality was 42-44% on permethrin-treated disks and 26% on carbaryl-treated disks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".