MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155082077 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.01.031

SCENIC International Consensus Statement on Surveillance and Management of Dysplasia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2015· article· en· W2155082077 on OpenAlexafffund
Loren Laine, Tonya Kaltenbach, Alan Barkun, Kenneth R. McQuaid, Venkataraman Subramanian, Roy Soetikno, James E. East, Francis A. Farraye, Brian G. Feagan, John P. A. Ioannidis, Ralf Kießlich, Michael J. Krier, Takayuki Matsumoto, Robert P. McCabe, Klaus Mönkemüller, Robert D. Odze, Michael F. Picco, David T. Rubin, Michele Rubin, Carlos Rubio‐Terres, Matthew D. Rutter, Andrés Sánchez-Yagüe, Silvia Sanduleanu, Amandeep K. Shergill, Thomas Ullman, Fernando Velayos, Douglas Yakich, Yu‐Xiao Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersUniversity of Chicago MedicineUniversity of California, San FranciscoSchool of Medicine, Stanford UniversityKarolinska InstitutetUniversity of OxfordAmerican Gastroenterological AssociationCanadian Association of GastroenterologyCrohn's and Colitis FoundationMcGill UniversityAmerican Society for Gastrointestinal EndoscopyUniversity of PennsylvaniaCrohn's and Colitis Foundation of AmericaUniversity of LeedsU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineStatement (logic)DiseaseDysplasiaIntensive care medicineGastroenterologyInternal medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The goal of this section is to define the optimal method(s) of detecting colon dysplasia in patients with IBD. Detection of dysplasia, which is the immediate goal of surveillance colonoscopy, was chosen as the primary endpoint, with the understanding that detection of dysplasia is not clearly documented to improve clinical outcomes such as CRC incidence or mortality. Only histologic diagnoses of lowgrade or high-grade dysplasia were considered; diagnoses of indefinite for dysplasia were excluded. Current guideline recommendations regarding the need for serial surveillance colonoscopy in patients with IBD were accepted, and other issues such as the appropriate surveillance interval or risk stratification 1-4,8-10 were not addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.031
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0310.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations767
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterologySame topicColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionFrench-language works237,207