MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155106517 · doi:10.1128/mbio.02489-14

Correction for Sandai et al., The Evolutionary Rewiring of Ubiquitination Targets Has Reprogrammed the Regulation of Carbon Assimilation in the Pathogenic Yeast Candida albicans

2015· erratum· en· W2155106517 on OpenAlexaff
Doblin Sandai, Zhikang Yin, Laura Selway, David Stead, Janet L. Walker, Michelle D. Leach, Iryna Bohovych, Iuliana V. Ene, Stavroula Kastora, Susan Budge, Carol A. Munro, Frank C. Odds, Neil A. R. Gow, Alistair J. P. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2015
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCandida albicansYeastUbiquitinAssimilation (phonology)MicrobiologyBiologyComputational biologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FIG 8 Addition of a consensus ubiquitin site stimulates glucose-accelerated degradation of CaIcl1 in C. albicans.(B) The carboxy-terminal ubiquitination site from ScIcl1 was fused to CaIcl1 to create CaIcl1-Ubi-Myc in C. albicans DSC04 (Table S1).These cells were grown on lactate, and the levels of CaIcl1-Ubi-Myc were assayed by Western blotting after glucose addition.As controls, the stabilities of CaIcl1-Myc (CA1395; open diamonds) and ScIcl1-Myc (DSC01; gray squares) in C. albicans were compared under equivalent conditions.CaIcl1-Ubi-Myc, ScIcl1-Myc, and CaIcl1-Myc levels are expressed as a percentage of their abundance at time zero (100%).Similar data were obtained from two independent replicate experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.136
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1360.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207