MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155107722 · doi:10.1039/c4ob00739e

Synthesis of 4-methyl-N′-(3-alkyl-2r,6c-diarylpiperidin-4-ylidene)-1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carbohydrazides with antioxidant, antitumor and antimicrobial activities

2014· article· en· W2155107722 on OpenAlexaff
Paulrasu Kodisundaram, D. Arul, Manikandan Palrasu, S. Amirthaganesan, Balasankar Thirunavukkarasu

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic & Biomolecular Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and biological activity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryAntimicrobialAlkylAntioxidantCombinatorial chemistryOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structures of the newly synthesized 4-methyl-N′-(3-alkyl-2r,6c-diarylpiperidin-4-ylidene)-1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carbohydrazide (5a–5l) were confirmed by spectral and elemental analysis. The difference in the potency of activity against various free radicals, human cancer cells and microbial strains has been evaluated by SAR. Compounds with electron-donating methoxy (5i and 5c) and methyl (5h and 5b) substitutions at the para position of the phenyl showed excellent free radical scavenging effects. In the tested compounds, electron withdrawing fluoro (5k and 5e), chloro (5j and 5d), and bromo (5l and 5f) substitution at the para position of the phenyl ring attached to C-2 and C-6 carbons of the piperidine moiety outperformed cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities. Our findings suggest that the antioxidant, anti-tumor and anti-microbial activities of compounds 5a–5l create promising leads for the development of potent anti-tumor and anti-microbial agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic & Biomolecular ChemistrySame topicSynthesis and biological activityFrench-language works237,207