Consolidation Therapy With Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal consolidation therapy for adults who are in first remission of acute myeloid leukemia after induction chemotherapy and who do not have a histocompatible donor is poorly established. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of autologous bone marrow transplantation with that of non-myeloablative chemotherapy alone (or no further treatment). METHODS: Eligible studies were identified by searching electronic databases and by examining the reference lists of relevant studies and review articles. Eligible studies were those that prospectively enrolled adults with acute myeloid leukemia and randomly assigned patients who were in first remission and who did not have a matched sibling donor to one of the two consolidation therapies. Two reviewers independently assessed all studies for relevance and validity. We used a fixed-effects model to calculate the ratio of probabilities for disease-free and overall survival at 48 months or at the nearest recorded assessment point for each study and for all studies combined. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We identified 587 potentially relevant studies, 36 of which were retrieved for detailed evaluation. In the six studies eligible for this meta-analysis, a total of 1044 patients were randomly assigned to receive autologous bone marrow transplantation or non-myeloablative chemotherapy (five studies) or autologous bone marrow transplantation or no further treatment (one study). Compared with patients who received chemotherapy or no further treatment, patients who received autologous bone marrow transplantation had a better disease-free survival (ratio of disease-free survival probabilities = 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06 to 1.44; P =.006) but a similar overall survival (ratio of overall survival probabilities = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.15; P =.86). CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the routine use of autologous bone marrow transplantation in adult acute myeloid leukemia patients in first remission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.052 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".