MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155157287

Metadata for Data Rescue and Data at Risk

2011· article· en· W2155157287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
William L. Anderson, John L. Faundeen, Jane Greenberg, Fraser Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueTexas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataDocumentationComputer scienceData elementData management planData mappingData scienceData dictionaryData managementWorld Wide WebDatabase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

John L. Faudeen is with the U.S. Geological Survey, Earth Observation and Science Center; Jane Greenberg is with the School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina; Fraser Taylor is with the Canadian Geomatics & Cartographic Research Centre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.057
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Reproducibility · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.057
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.012
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.024
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTexas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)Same topicResearch Data Management PracticesFrench-language works237,207