MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155166735 · doi:10.4141/s02-056

Cover crops and nitrogen fertilization effects on soil aggregation and carbon and nitrogen pools

2003· article· en· W2155166735 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Upendra M. Sainju, Wayne F. Whitehead, Bharat Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover cropLoamVicia villosaAgronomyChemistrySecaleMineralization (soil science)Soil carbonLegumeNitrogenSoil waterBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cover crops and N fertilization rates may influence soil aggregation and associated C and N pools, thereby affecting soil quality and productivity. We compared the effects of legume [hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) and crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.)] and nonlegume [rye (Secale cereale L.)] cover crops and N fertilization rates {half N rate [HN: 90 kg N ha-1 yr-1 for 3 yr of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) followed by 80 kg N ha-1 yr-1 for eggplant (Solanum melogena L.)]} and full N rate [FN: 180 kg N ha-1 yr-1 for 3 yr of tomato followed by 160 kg N ha-1 yr-1 for eggplant]} on soil aggregation and C and N pools in whole-soil and aggregates. The pools were organic C, total N, potential C mineralization and potential N mineralization (PCM and PNM), microbial biomass C and microbial biomass N (MBC and MBN), and particulate organic C and particulate organic N (POC and PON). Field experiment was conducted in a Greenville fine sandy loam (fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic, Rhodic Kandiudults) from 1995 to 2000 in Fort Valley, Georgia, USA. While the amount of soil present in aggregates decreased with decreasing size class, the amount was greater with nonlegume and FN than with HN and legume cover crops in the 2.00- to 0.85-mm size class. Organic C, PCM, and MBC contents in whole-soil were greater with nonlegume, but MBN and PON were greater with legumes than in the control with no cover crop or N fertilization. Organic C and total N concentrations in aggregates were greater in 2.00- to 0.50-mm than in 4.75- to 2.00-mm, <0.25-mm, or <4.75-mm (whole-soil) size classes, but PNM and MBN were greater in <0.50- or <4.75-mm than in 4.75- to 2.00-mm size classes. As POC and PON decreased with decreasing aggregate-size class, POC in the <0.85-mm size class was greater with nonlegume and PON in the 2.00- to 0.85-mm size classes was greater with legumes than with the control and N rates. Nonlegume may increase soil aggregation, microbial activities, and C sequestration, but legumes may increase N mineralization in the soil compared with no cover crop. Nitrogen fertilization also may improve soil aggregation. Nitrogen mineralization and C and N sequestration may be greater in aggregates <2.00 mm diameter. Cover crops and N fertilization may improve soil quality and productivity, particularly in intermediate and small size (<2.00 mm) aggregates. Key words: Cover crop, nitrogen fertilization, soil aggregation, soil carbon, soil nitrogen

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations212
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207