MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155177453 · doi:10.1255/ejms.433

Dissociation Reactions of Low-Energy Pentenyl Methyl Ether Radical Cations C <sub>5</sub> H <sub>9</sub> OCH <sub>3</sub> <sup>•+</sup>

2001· article· en· W2155177453 on OpenAlex
Richard D. Bowen, Moschoula A. Trikoupis, Johan K. Terlouw

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Mass Spectrometry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersDivision of Materials Research
KeywordsChemistryOxonium ionDissociation (chemistry)IonBond-dissociation energyAllylic rearrangementEtherMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dissociation chemistry of the low-energy C 5 H 9 OCH 3 •+ ions generated from the 13 isomeric pentenyl methyl ethers derived from stable alkenols has been studied. This was done by examining their metastable ion characteristics, in conjunction with 2 H and 13 C-labelling as well as collision-induced dissociation and neutralisation–reionisation experiments. The influence of the position and substitution pattern of the double bond on the chemistry of these C 6 H 12 O •+ species is considered. The closely similar reactions of C 2 H 5 CH=CHCH 2 OCH 3 •+ , 3 •+ , CH 2 =CH–CH(C 2 H 5 )OCH 3 •+ , 4 •+ , and CH 2 =C(C 2 H 5 )CH 2 OCH 3 •+ , 13 •+ , point to a common chemistry, which is rationalised in terms of facile 1,2-H and 1,2-C 2 H 5 shifts via distonic ions. Each of the other isomers displays a distinct, though often related, chemistry. The eight allylic ionised ethers easily lose CH 3 • to produce C 5 H 9 O + oxonium ions, whose structure was established by CID experiments; ions 3 •+ / 4 •+ / 13 •+ also readily expel C 2 H 5 • to give C 4 H 7 O + ions of structure CH 2 =CH–C + (H)OCH 3 . Elimination of CH 3 OH is also significant for 3 •+ / 4 •+ / 13 •+ and for (CH 3 ) 2 C=CHCH 2 OCH 3 •+ , 8 •+ , and CH 3 CH=C(CH 3 )CH 2 OCH 3 •+ , 11 •+ . Besides expelling CH 3 • and/or C 2 H 5 • and CH 3 OH, the three homoallylic isomers undergo dissociations which are (almost) absent for their allylic counterparts: thus, both CH 3 CH=CH(CH 2 ) 2 OCH 3 •+ , 2 •+ , and CH 2 =CH–CH(CH 3 )CH 2 OCH 3 •+ , 10 •+ , lose H • and H 2 O, whereas CH 2 =C(CH 3 )CH 2 CH 2 OCH 3 •+ , 7 •+ , is unique in predominantly losing CH 2 O. For the losses of CH 2 O and H 2 O mechanisms are proposed in which ion–neutral complexes of the type [C 5 H 10 •+ / CH 2 O] and [C 6 H 10 •+ / H 2 O] are key intermediates. The behaviour of the non-(homo)allylic isomer, CH 2 =CH(CH 2 ) 3 OCH 3 •+ , 1 •+ , is similar to that of 2 •+ but the reactions occur in different proportions. A mechanism for the facile loss of an alkyl radical from 1 + is proposed in which 1,4-H shifts and distonic ions as well as communication with ionised cyclopentyl methyl ether, 14 •+ , play an important role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it