MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155208718 · doi:10.1109/iscas.1993.394008

Designing operational transconductance amplifiers for low voltage operation

2002· article· en· W2155208718 on OpenAlex
P. Crawley, Gordon W. Roberts

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venue1993 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransconductanceBandwidth (computing)AmplifierCurrent mirrorSwingComputer scienceOperational amplifierVoltageOperational transconductance amplifierElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringRange (aeronautics)EngineeringTelecommunicationsTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To design operational transconductance amplifiers (OTAs) for high-performance applications it is necessary to use cascoded current mirrors. In low-voltage applications the standard cascoded current mirror cannot be used. The solution is to use the generalized high-swing cascoded current mirror. With these newer OTA designs it is possible to have cascoding in the design without significantly reducing the linear output voltage range. High-swing OTAs already exist. With the authors' generalized scheme, multiple cascoded OTAs can be built. They have significantly larger bandwidth for the same low-frequency gain than single cascoded OTAs, and do not sacrifice any of the linear output voltage range.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.954

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it