MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2155223808 · doi:10.1109/ict.2003.1287487

A common behavior of thermoelectric layered cobaltites: an incommensurate spin density wave state

2004· article· en· W2155223808 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Sugiyama, Hiroshi Itahara, J. H. Brewer, Eduardo J. Ansaldo, Kazuhiko Dohmae, Chao Xia, Yoshiki Seno, B. Hitti, Toshihiko Tani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCobaltiteSpin density waveCondensed matter physicsMuon spin spectroscopyPhysicsAnisotropyMaterials scienceAntiferromagnetism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetism of misfit layered cobaltites, [Ca/sub 2/CoO/sub 3/]/sub 0.62//sup RS/[CoO/sub 2/] and [Ca/sub 2/Co/sub 4/3/Cu/sub 2/3/O/sub 4/]/sub 0.62//sup RS/[CoO/sub 2/] (RS denotes a rocksalt-type block), was investigated by a positive muon spin rotation and relaxation (/spl mu//sup +/SR) experiment. For the former cobaltite, a transition to an incommensurate (IC) spin density wave (SDW) state was found below 100 K (=T/sub SDW//sup on/) and a clear oscillation due to a static internal magnetic field was observed below 30 K (=T/sub SDW/). For the latter cobaltite, T/sub SDW//sup on/=180 K and T/sub SDW/=140 K, respectively. The wide transition width (= 40-70 K) suggested that a short-range IC-SDW order appeared below T/sub SDW//sup on/ and a long-range order completed below T/sub SDW/. Furthermore, an anisotropic behavior of the zero-field /spl mu//sup +/SR spectra on the c axis aligned samples indicated that the IC-SDW propagates in the a-b plane, with oscillating moments directed along the c axis. These results suggest that the IC-SDW exist not in the rocksalt-type block but in the CoO/sub 2/ plane.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism→French-language works237,207→