MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155245639 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.41.3.597

PLATINUM-GROUP MINERALS IN PODIFORM CHROMITITES OF THE OMAN OPHIOLITE

2003· article· en· W2155245639 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceMinistry of Economy
KeywordsOphioliteGeologyGeochemistryChromititeGroup (periodic table)Platinum groupPlatinumPaleontologyChemistryTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chromitite lenses rich in the platinum-group elements (PGE) have recently been discovered in the deeper part of the mantle section of the northern part of the Oman ophiolite. In terms of stratigraphic level, there are two types of chromitite: Moho transition zone (MTZ) and mantle types. The mantle type can be further classified into two subtypes: PGE-poor and PGE-rich. Platinum-group minerals (PGM) have been mainly observed in the PGE-rich mantle chromitite and, to a lesser extent, in the PGE-poor mantle chromitite, although a few PGM grains have been detected from the MTZ chromitites. The PGM comprise four main categories in the following order of abundance: (1) sulfides [Os-rich laurite, erlichmanite and unnamed (Ir,Rh)(Ni,Cu,Fe)2S3], (2) sulfarsenide and arsenide (irarsite–hollingworthite series, palladoarsenide), (3) alloys and native metals [Os–Ir alloy, (Cu–Pt–Fe– Ir–Rh) alloy, Pt–Fe alloy, (Ni–Ru–Os–Ir) alloy, Ir–Pt alloy, Ir–Rh alloy and native Pd metal], and (4) PGE oxide (Ru–Os–Ir oxide). Base-metal sulfides (BMS) and base-metal alloys (BMA) also are found, as inclusions in chromian spinel and interstitial matrix, mainly in the MTZ and PGE-poor mantle chromitites. The common abundance of PGE sulfides, i.e., Os-rich laurite, in the Oman chromitites is ascribed to the sulfide-undersaturated nature of the magma involved in chromitite formation. However, the sulfur fugacity was sufficiently high to produce the Os-rich laurite and, to a lesser extent, erlichmanite and Ru-poor Os–Ir alloy. The sulfur fugacity was higher in the formation of the PGE-poor mantle chromitite relative to the PGE-rich chromitite, as indi-cated by the presence of the unnamed Ir-rich sulfides and, to a lesser extent, BMS. The presence of PGE oxide commonly associated with fractured chromian spinel indicates that the PGE distribution in rocks can easily be modified at an early stage of serpentinization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it