First‐in‐man use of a tapered endovascular stent graft for treatment of aneurysm after coarctation repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Endovascular stenting of aneurysms late after surgical repair of coarctation may have to deal with marked changes in aortic diameter proximal and distal to the aneurysm. We report our first-in-man successful use of a custom-made tapered (variable diameter) covered stent. METHODS: The aneurysm was 42 mm in diameter with a length of 40 mm. On MRI, the aorta measured 19.6 mm proximal and 13.3 mm distal to the aneurysm. The aim was to oversize the stent by 10-20%. A covered Cheatham-platinum stent was designed so that cranial portion of the stent would expand to 22 mm and the caudal portion to 15 mm with a length of 8.5 cm when fully inflated. The stent was mounted on a balloon-in-balloon delivery system and was delivered through an 18 F femoral arterial sheath. Rapid-pacing technique was used for deployment. RESULTS: The stent was successfully deployed without complications. After deployment, the stent diameter measured 21.2 mm cranially and 15.6 mm caudally. A mild distal endoleak due to inadequate fixation of the stent graft was resolved by post dilation expanding the stent diameter to 22.1 mm and 15.9 mm, respectively. The femoral access site was closed using two percutaneous closure devices and the patient discharged the day after the procedure. Follow-up CT-angiography showed continued successful exclusion of the aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: A new custom-made balloon expandable covered stent-design enabled successful treatment of an aortic aneurysm. This design may offer greater potential for more favorable initial angiographic results and potentially long-term outcomes due to superior apposition to the aortic wall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".