MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155276271 · doi:10.1002/jms.1708

A fast, reproducible and low‐cost method for sequence deconvolution of ‘on‐bead’ peptides via ‘on‐target’ maldi‐TOF/TOF mass spectrometry

2009· article· en· W2155276271 on OpenAlexafffund
Giulio A. Amadei, Choi‐Fong Cho, John D. Lewis, Leonard G. Luyt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mass Spectrometry · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsCancer Care OntarioWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryPeptideLinkerChromatographyMatrix-assisted laser desorption/ionizationPentamerPolystyreneMALDI imagingDeconvolutionCombinatorial chemistryDesorptionPolymerAdsorptionAlgorithmBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel approach to high-throughput sequence deconvolution of on-bead small peptides (MW < 2000 Da) using on-target MALDI-TOF/TOF instrumentation is presented. Short peptides of pentamer and octamer length, covalently attached to TentaGel polystyrene beads through a photolabile linker, were placed onto the MALDI target, apportioned with suitable matrix (2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid) and then hit with the instrument laser (Nd : YAG, 355 nm). This induced easy and highly reproducible photochemical cleavage, desorption (MS mode) and fragmentation (MS/MS mode). Peptide fragments were identified with a mass accuracy of 0.1 Da of the expected values. This technique significantly accelerates the sequence determination of positive peptide hits obtained from random combinatorial libraries when screening against biological targets, paving the way for a rapid and efficient method to identify molecular imaging ligands specific to pathological targets in cancer and other diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207