MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155317165 · doi:10.1139/z01-227

Thermal ecology of male tarantulas (<i>Aphonopelma anax</i>) during the mating season

2002· article· en· W2155317165 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cara Shillington

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAmerican Arachnological Society
KeywordsBiologyEveningMorningFossorialMatingSeasonal breederEcologyZoologyRange (aeronautics)Animal scienceBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the mating season, male tarantulas abandon their burrows and actively search for widely distributed females, which remain fossorial. As a result, males are exposed to larger fluctuations in environmental conditions without the protection of a permanent retreat. Body temperatures (Tb) of active male tarantulas (Aphonopelma anax) encountered fortuitously in the field ranged from 24.7 to 35.1°C and preferred Tb's measured in a laboratory thermal gradient ranged from 22.1 to 31.3°C. The thermal options available to males at random points in their environment varied substantially throughout the day but temperatures typically exceeded 40°C. In comparison, temperatures within burrows remained below 40°C. Indices calculated from these temperature data suggested that males thermoregulated effectively during the day, while environmental temperatures were within their preferred Tbrange at night and so active regulation of Tbwas unnecessary. In addition, I determined the exact times that males ceased locomotory activity in the morning (retreat) and when they started activity in the evening (emergence). Data from 23 radio-tagged males indicated that they retreated into temporary burrows between 06:47 and 10:53 CST. Activity commenced again between 16:36 and 20:53 CST as temperatures approached their preferred or selected Tbrange.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207