Morphometric Analysis of Explant Lungs in Cystic Fibrosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: After repeated cycles of lung infection and inflammation, patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) evolve to respiratory insufficiency. Although histology and imaging have provided descriptive information, a thorough morphometric analysis of end-stage CF lung disease is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the involvement of small and large airways in end-stage CF. METHODS: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and micro-CT were applied to 11 air-inflated CF explanted lungs and 7 control lungs to measure, count, and describe the airway and parenchymal abnormalities in end-stage CF lungs. Selected abnormalities were further investigated with thin section histology. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On MDCT, CF explanted lungs showed an increased median (interquartile range) number (631 [511-710] vs. 344 [277-349]; P = 0.003) and size of visible airways (cumulative airway diameter 217 cm [209-250] vs. 91 cm [80-105]; P < 0.001) compared with controls. Airway obstruction was seen, starting from generation 6 and increasing to 40 to 50% of airways from generation 9 onward. Micro-CT showed that the total number of terminal bronchioles was decreased (2.9/ml [2.6-4.4] vs. 5.3/ml [4.8-5.7]; P < 0.001); 49% were obstructed, and the cross-sectional area of the open terminal bronchioles was reduced (0.093 mm(2) [0.084-0.123] vs. 0.179 mm(2) [0.140-0.196]; P < 0.001). On micro-CT, 41% of the obstructed airways reopened more distally. This remodeling was confirmed on histological analysis. Parenchymal changes were also seen, mostly in a patchy and peribronchiolar distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive changes of dilatation and obstruction in nearly all airway generations were observed in end-stage CF lung disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".