MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155456746 · doi:10.1504/ijcmsse.2007.014874

Applications of artificial intelligence methods for modelling of solidus temperature for hypoeutectic Al-Si-Cu alloys

2007· article· en· W2155456746 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L. A. Dobrzański, R. Maniara, Jerry Sokolowski, W. Kasprzak

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Materials Science and Surface Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsSolidusEutectic systemMaterials scienceMetallurgyCastingAtmospheric temperature rangeAluminiumThermodynamicsAlloyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the application of neural networks for prediction of the solidus temperature of various hypoeutectic Al-Si-Cu casting alloys cooled with different Cooling Rates (CR). Knowledge of solidus temperature allows the prediction of a variety of metallurgical characteristics, that is, melt treatment, casting temperature and solidification range. Currently, the literature reports only one equation for determination of solidus temperature for hypoeutectic aluminium alloys. This paper presents computational algorithm, comparison with different models' predicted solidus temperature and influence of alloying elements on solidus temperature. The results of this investigation show that there is a good correlation between experimental and calculated dates and the neural network has great potential in modelling of solidus temperature of Al-Si-Cu alloys. The worked out model can be applied in the computer system for calculating of chemical composition and CR influence on the solidus temperature of Al-Si-Cu alloys. [Received 22 November 2006, Accepted 15 January 2007]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Computational Materials Science and Surface EngineeringSame topicAluminum Alloy Microstructure PropertiesFrench-language works237,207