Acute local subcutaneous VEGF<sub>165</sub> injection for augmentation of skin flap viability: efficacy and mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Distal skin ischemic necrosis is a common complication in skin flap surgery. The pathogenesis of skin flap ischemic necrosis is unclear, and there is no clinical treatment available. Here, we used the 4 x 10 cm rat dorsal skin flap model to test our hypothesis that subcutaneous injection of vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF165) in skin flaps at the time of surgery is effective in augmentation of skin flap viability, which is associated with an increase in nitric oxide (NO) production, and the mechanism involves 1) an increase in skin flap blood flow in the early stage after surgery and 2) enhanced angiogenesis subsequently to sustain increased skin flap blood flow and viability. We observed that subcutaneous injection of VEGF165 in skin flaps at the time of surgery increased skin flap viability in a dose-dependent manner. Subcutaneous injection of VEGF165 at the dose of 2 microg/flap increased skin flap viability by 28% (P < 0.05; n = 8). Over 80% of this effect was blocked by intramuscular injection of the NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor Nomega-nitro-L-arginine (13 mg/kg) 45 min before surgery (P < 0.05; n = 8). The VEGF165 treatment also increased skin flap blood flow (2.68 +/- 0.63 ml x min(-1) x 100 g(-1)) compared with the control (1.26 +/- 0.10 ml x min(-1) x 100 g(-1); P < 0.05, n = 6) assessed 6 h postoperatively. There was no change in skin flap capillary density at this time point. VEGF165-induced increase in capillary density (32.2 +/- 1.1 capillaries/mm2; P < 0.05, n = 7) compared with control (24.6 +/- 1.4 capillaries/mm2) was seen 7 days postoperatively. There was also evidence to indicate that VEGF165-induced NO production in skin flaps was stimulated by activation of NOS activity followed by upregulation of NOS protein expression. These observations support our hypothesis and for the first time provide an important insight into the mechanism of acute local VEGF165 protein therapy in mitigation of skin flap ischemic necrosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".