MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2155615201 · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001346

The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials

2012· article· en· W2155615201 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Charles Weijer, Jeremy Grimshaw, Martin Eccles, Andrew D. McRae, Angela White, Monica Taljaard

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics in Clinical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryOttawa HospitalFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of OttawaWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research ChairsUniversity College LondonNewcastle UniversityLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Pennsylvania
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialCluster (spacecraft)Statement (logic)Research ethicsResearch designFamily medicineMedicinePolitical scienceInternal medicineComputer scienceLawSocial scienceSociologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.455
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.558
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4550.558
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.010
Bibliometrics0.0070.012
Science and technology studies0.0090.019
Scholarly communication0.0170.006
Open science0.0120.007
Research integrity0.0250.037
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.785
GPT teacher head0.615
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations302
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS MedicineSame topicEthics in Clinical ResearchFrench-language works237,207