Leaf cutter ants: a possible missing source of biogenic halocarbons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental context. With large reductions in anthropogenic emissions of many ozone-depleting gases in response to the Montreal Protocol, gases with biogenic sources have become relatively more important in recent years. The global budgets of the biogenic halocarbons are unbalanced with known sinks outweighing sources, suggesting that additional natural sources are required to balance the budgets. In the present study, an investigation has been carried out to determine the importance of leaf cutter ants as a missing source of the biogenic halocarbons, which will reduce the discrepancy of the global budget of the halocarbons. Abstract. Leaf cutter ant colonies are shown to be a potentially significant new source of biogenic halocarbons. Fungus cultivated by these ant species may emit CH3Br, CH3I, CH3Cl, CH2Cl2 and CHCl3 in significant quantities, contributing to their respective global atmospheric budgets. The study suggests that the mixing ratios of CH3Br, CH3I, CH3Cl, CH2Cl2 and CHCl3 in the ant colony under test were significantly higher than background levels, by on average a factor of 1.5–5.0. Sampling was carried out during three stages of ant colony development (new, moderately active and highly active) and it was found that levels of these halocarbons were elevated during the active phases of the ant colony life cycle. A very rough estimate of the possible emission of CH3Br, CH3I, CH3Cl, CH2Cl2 and CHCl3 from ant colonies globally are 0.50, 0.02, 0.80, 0.15 and 0.22 Gg year–1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".