First-Generation Aortic Endografts: Analysis of Explanted Stentor Devices from the EUROSTAR Registry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the structure and healing characteristics of chronically implanted Stentor endografts that were explanted due to migration, endoleak, thrombosis, or aneurysm expansion. METHODS: The devices were harvested following reoperation (n = 5) or autopsy (n = 1) with implantation times ranging from 13 to 53 months. Structural modifications to the metal components were examined using radiography, endoscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Specimens taken from components of the modular stent-grafts were examined histologically and with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess healing behavior. Physical and chemical stability of the nitinol wires and woven polyester graft material was evaluated using SEM and electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis. RESULTS: Although the endografts were retrieved for a variety of reasons, they exhibited similar healing and structural modifications. The woven polyester sleeve showed evidence of yarn shifting and distortion, yarn damage, and filament breakage leading to the formation of openings in the fabric. The luminal surface endografts showed incomplete healing characterized by a poorly organized, nonadherent thrombotic matrix of variable thickness. Radiographic and endoscopic observations indicated that structural failure of the grafts, particularly in the main aortic component, was related to severe compaction and dislocation of the metallic frame due to suture breaks. Corrosion marks were observed on some nitinol wires in all devices. Chemical analysis and ion bombardment of the nitinol wires revealed that the surface concentrations of titanium and nickel were not homogenous. The first layer was composed of carbon or organic elements, followed by a stratum of highly oxidized titanium with a low nickel concentration; the titanium-nickel alloy lay beneath these layers. CONCLUSIONS: Although the materials selected for construction of endovascular grafts appears judicious, the assembly of these biomaterials into various interrelated structures within the device requires further improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".