MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156073112 · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0340

A Genome-wide Association Study of Early-Onset Breast Cancer Identifies <i>PFKM</i> as a Novel Breast Cancer Gene and Supports a Common Genetic Spectrum for Breast Cancer at Any Age

2014· article· en· W2156073112 on OpenAlexaff
Habibul Ahsan, Jerry Halpern, Muhammad G. Kibriya, Brandon L. Pierce, Tong Lin, Eric R. Gamazon, Valerie McGuire, Anna Felberg, Jianxin Shi, Farzana Jasmine, Shantanu Roy, Rachelle Brutus, Maria Argos, Stephanie C. Melkonian, Jenny Chang‐Claude, Irene L. Andrulis, John L. Hopper, Esther M. John, Kathi Malone, Giske Ursin, Marilie D. Gammon, Duncan C. Thomas, Daniela Seminara, Graham Casey, Julia A. Knight, Melissa C. Southey, Graham G. Giles, Regina M. Santella, Eunjung Lee, David V. Conti, David Duggan, Steve Gallinger, Robert W. Haile, Mark A. Jenkins, Noralane M. Lindor, Polly A. Newcomb, Kyriaki Michailidou, Carmel Apicella, Daniel J. Park, Julian Peto, Olivia Fletcher, Isabel dos‐Santos‐Silva, Mark Lathrop, David J. Hunter, Stephen J. Chanock, Alfons Meindl, Rita K. Schmutzler, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, Magdalena Lochmann, Lars Beckmann, Rebecca Hein, Enes Makalic, Daniel F. Schmidt, Minh Bui, Jennifer Stone, Dieter Flesch‐Janys, Norbert Dahmen, Heli Nevanlinna, Kristiina Aittomäki, Carl Blomqvist, Per Hall, Kamila Czene, Astrid Irwanto, Jianjun Liu, Nazneen Rahman, Clare Turnbull, Alison M. Dunning, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Quinten Waisfisz, Hanne Meijers‐Heijboer, André G. Uitterlinden, Fernando Rivadeneira, Dan L. Nicolae, Douglas F. Easton, Nancy J. Cox, Alice S. Whittemore

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Mental HealthCancer Research UK
KeywordsBreast cancerCancerMedicineGenetic associationGenome-wide association studyOncologyGeneInternal medicineBiologyGeneticsGenotypeSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early-onset breast cancer (EOBC) causes substantial loss of life and productivity, creating a major burden among women worldwide. We analyzed 1,265,548 Hapmap3 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) among a discovery set of 3,523 EOBC incident cases and 2,702 population control women ages ≤ 51 years. The SNPs with smallest P values were examined in a replication set of 3,470 EOBC cases and 5,475 control women. We also tested EOBC association with 19,684 genes by annotating each gene with putative functional SNPs, and then combining their P values to obtain a gene-based P value. We examined the gene with smallest P value for replication in 1,145 breast cancer cases and 1,142 control women. The combined discovery and replication sets identified 72 new SNPs associated with EOBC (P < 4 × 10(-8)) located in six genomic regions previously reported to contain SNPs associated largely with later-onset breast cancer (LOBC). SNP rs2229882 and 10 other SNPs on chromosome 5q11.2 remained associated (P < 6 × 10(-4)) after adjustment for the strongest published SNPs in the region. Thirty-two of the 82 currently known LOBC SNPs were associated with EOBC (P < 0.05). Low power is likely responsible for the remaining 50 unassociated known LOBC SNPs. The gene-based analysis identified an association between breast cancer and the phosphofructokinase-muscle (PFKM) gene on chromosome 12q13.11 that met the genome-wide gene-based threshold of 2.5 × 10(-6). In conclusion, EOBC and LOBC seem to have similar genetic etiologies; the 5q11.2 region may contain multiple distinct breast cancer loci; and the PFKM gene region is worthy of further investigation. These findings should enhance our understanding of the etiology of breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207