Fixation of Unstable Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Knee Using Arthroscopic Autogenous Osteochondral Grafting (Mosaicplasty)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: A number of surgical techniques have been described for the operative fixation of an unstable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion in the knee that has failed appropriate nonoperative management. However, no one technique has been universally successful. We report the results of a new fixation technique for unstable OCD lesions using arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral grafting (mosaicplasty). METHODS: Twenty patients with OCD lesions (16 International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] OCD type II, 3 ICRS OCD type III, and 1 ICRS OCD type IV) who had failed an appropriate course of nonoperative management underwent autogenous osteochondral grafting. The OCD lesions were assessed arthroscopically and then fixed in situ by using multiple 4.5-mm osteochondral dowel grafts harvested from the edges of the femoral trochlea. The lesion was initially fixed with an osteochondral graft passing through the center of the fragment and then stabilized by using further grafts inserted around its periphery. RESULTS: Preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores assessed 5 patients as nearly normal, 8 as abnormal, and 7 as severely abnormal. At the 18-month follow-up, all of the knees were scored as normal. The average preoperative visual analog pain score out of 10 was 8.3, which was reduced to 0.8 at 6 months and to 0 at 1 year after surgery. Serial magnetic resonance imaging scans showed healing of the bony part of the lesion in all of the knees 6 months after surgery and continuous articular cartilage healing at 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Autogenous osteochondral grafting of unstable OCD lesions in the knee is a reliable and minimally invasive technique that provides a stable biologic fixation using autogenous bone graft and has few complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".