MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156087493 · doi:10.1121/1.1427358

A stability analysis of a decentralized adaptive feedback active control system of sinusoidal sound in free space

2002· article· en· W2156087493 on OpenAlexaff
Estelle Leboucher, Philippe Micheau, Alain Berry, A. L’Espérance

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceStability (learning theory)Nyquist stability criterionConvergence (economics)Control systemController (irrigation)Control (management)Adaptive controlElectric power systemPower (physics)Small-gain theoremMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In some cases, the implementation of active control of sound in free space requires a large number of secondary sources and error sensors. In terms of control hardware, this may translate into considerable processing power requirement. A practical method to decrease processing power is to decentralize the control; that is, implement many single-input, single-output independent controllers operating simultaneously instead of a large multiple-input, multiple-output system. The main drawback of decentralized control is the risk of global instability. The purpose of this paper is to derive conditions under which globally stable control system behavior can be obtained in the case of adaptive feedback decentralized control for a sinusoidal disturbance. The main objective is to give practical conditions derived from the small gain theorem and the Nyquist criterion for the stability of the control system. These conditions only take into account the geometrical arrangement of the secondary sources and error sensors. This analysis involves a new parameter beta called "performance index," which is associated with both the convergence of the individual controllers and the global stability of the system. Simulation and experimental results are shown to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed analytical tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207