Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Abstract
Structured summary 2 Provide a structured summary including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings, systematic review registration number Flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review No of records identified through database searching No of additional records identified through other sources No of records after duplicates removed No of studies included in qualitative synthesis No of studies included in quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- BMJ
- Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Field
- Decision Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- Ottawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
- Funders
- Medical Research CouncilCare and Public Health Research Institute, Universiteit MaastrichtHealth Services Research and DevelopmentCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthCancer Research UKMcMaster UniversityOttawa Hospital Research InstituteJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of IoanninaGlaxoSmithKlineUniversity of BernUniversity of Ottawa
- Keywords
- Systematic reviewStatement (logic)Computer scienceInformation retrievalData scienceMEDLINEMedicineWorld Wide WebBiologyPolitical science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes