MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156128870 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2005.1602838

Ultrabroadband single crystal composite transducers for underwater ultrasound

2006· article· en· W2156128870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Cochran, M.F. Parker, P. Marin-Franch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsTransducerBroadbandMaterials sciencePiezoelectricityAcousticsBandwidth (computing)HarmonicsFabricationUltrasonic sensorComposite numberStack (abstract data type)OpticsComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsComposite materialElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Through the use of complex piezoelectric structures, it is possible to obtain resonant harmonics not observed in the usual oddharmonic response of a conventional structure. When combined with inherently broadband components, such as composites made with PMNPT single crystal material, this permits the realisation of ultrabroadband devices. In the work reported here, results from modelling indicate that a bandwidth improvement by a factor up to four is possible compared with standard piezoceramic transducers. Experimental validation of this theoretical finding has taken place. This validation required a three-stage development process. The first stage involved careful selection of material and full characterisation using the commercial PRAP code (TASI Technical, Ontario, Canada). The output data were then used in modelling to simulate the behaviour of the bulk PMN-PT and good correlation was established. The second stage involved the fabrication of several composites with different PMN-PT volume fractions and adjustment of the model parameters to reduce disagreements between experiment and theory. The new parameters were then utilised in the third stage which involved acoustic stack design and optimisation. Several single crystal composite multilayer transducers, designated PAT-UBB-SC, were subsequently made. Operating with centre frequencies around 600 kHz and apertures of 10 mm x 15 mm, pulse-echo tests have shown a -6 dB relative bandwidth up to 125%, very close to the predicted 135%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207