The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study contributes to our understanding of the mediating and moderating processes \nthrough which human resource management (HRM) practices are linked with \nbehavioural outcomes. We developed and tested a moderated mediation model linking \nperceived HRM practices to organisational citizenship behaviour and turnover \nintentions. Drawing on social exchange theory, our model posits that the effect of \nperceived HRM practices on both outcome variables is mediated by levels of employee \nengagement, while the relationship between employee engagement and both outcome \nvariables is moderated by perceived organisational support and leader–member \nexchange. Overall, data from 297 employees in a service sector organisation in the UK \nsupport this model. This suggests that the enactment of positive behavioural outcomes, \nas a consequence of engagement, largely depends on the wider organisational climate \nand employees’ relationship with their line manager. Implications for practice and \ndirections for future research are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it