MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156177480 · doi:10.1148/radiol.13121104

Sex Difference in Normal Thymic Appearance in Adults 20–30 Years of Age

2013· article· en· W2156177480 on OpenAlexaff
Jeanne B. Ackman, Bojan Kovacina, Brett W. Carter, Carol C. Wu, Amita Sharma, Jo-Anne O. Shepard, Elkan F. Halpern

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnalysis of varianceInstitutional review boardWilcoxon signed-rank testLinear regressionNuclear medicineInternal medicineSurgeryMann–Whitney U testStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To determine whether there is a sex difference in the appearance of the normal thymus in 20-30-year-old men and women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board and was compliant with HIPAA. The requirement for informed consent was waived. Images and medical records of 238 consecutive subjects without known thymic disease (175 men, 63 women) who underwent chest computed tomography with intravenous contrast material in 2008 were reviewed. Average thymic region of interest (ROI), subjective assessment of thymic attenuation by using a scale of grades 0-3, thymic anteroposterior measurement, and mean maximal thymic lobe thickness were recorded by two independent thoracic radiologists, blinded to subject age and sex. Thymic morphologic characteristics were assessed in consensus. The two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Student t test, test for linear regression, analysis of covariance, two-way factorial analysis of variance, and continuity-adjusted χ(2) test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was a significant sex difference in thymic attenuation as measured objectively by using mean thymic ROI measurement (P < .0001) and subjectively by using a scale of grades 0-3 (P < .0001), which held true when corrected for age (P < .0001). A sex difference was also found in regard to the rate of decrease in mean thymic attenuation with age, with men's thymuses exhibiting a significant decrease in attenuation during the decade, unlike women (P = .0479). There was no significant sex difference in mean maximal thymic lobe thickness (P = .8697). A quadrilateral, as opposed to triangular, configuration of the thymus was more common in women than men (P = .0034). CONCLUSION: There is a significant sex difference in normal thymic appearance in 20-30-year-old men and women. The thymus of 20-30-year-old women typically exhibits higher attenuation and more commonly exhibits a quadrilateral configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaFrench-language works237,207