Solid Tumors and Photobiomodulation: A Novel Approach to Induce Physiologically Reparative Homeostasis / Homeokinesis. Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been argued that loss of homeostasis is what, in essence, allows cancer cells to divide and invade tissues. Hence, novel anticancer therapies should aim not only at killing cancer cells, but at reestablishing homeostasis /homeokinesis. This review aims to present and discuss evidence on the potential use of laser photobiomodulation in the treatment of solid tumors. We propose that, by supplying external electromagnetic (light) energy within parameters capable of powering and regulating electrochemical biological systems, photobiomodulation may help restore homeostasis/homeokinesis–inducing physiologically reparative effects for disease reversal in cancer and other complex diseases. This view is based on more than two decades of research, which indicates that light can modulate physiologic energy pathways and, in particular, ATP generation and signaling via the “classic” respiratory chain pathway and through light-water interactions in tissues and oxygen-independent mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".