MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156323098 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-4308

Abstract 4308: 3D nuclear telomeric signatures define circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and characterize CTC subpopulations in intermediate risk prostate cancer patients

2014· article· en· W2156323098 on OpenAlexaff
Awe A. Julius, Adam P. Yan, Nidhi Shah, Klewes Ludger, Alexandra Kuzyk, Michael S. Xu, Ramy Boles, Jeff Saranchuk, Darrel Drachenberg, Sabine Mai

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirculating tumor cellProstate cancerMedicineCancerProstateBiomarkerOncologyDiseaseInternal medicinePathologyCancer researchMetastasisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Intermediate risk prostate cancer is a current medical challenge since the patients in this group can either be stable or progress, and there is no predictor for individual risk. Stratifying these patients would spare the patients unnecessary treatment or indicate the start of treatment immediately without losing precious time. Currently, prostate specific antigen (PSA) is used as evidence for biochemical progression. A more sensitive biomarker is needed to detect disease progression earlier and more reliably. We have isolated circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using a filtration-based device (ScreenCell). We subsequently performed the genetic characterization of the captured CTCs on a single cell basis. Using three-dimensional (3D) nuclear telomere imaging and quantitative analysis of 3D telomeric signatures of CTCs, we have characterized CTCs in the blood of the patients and have identified patient subgroups with one or more groups of CTCs. 380 samples of intermediate risk prostate cancer all revealed the presence of CTCs. However, the CTCs found were not genetically identical. Marked heterogeneity was seen, and three main groups of CTC profiles were defined based on TeloView software our group developed earlier. Repeat samples taken 6 months intervals define stable, mildly changing and significantly altered 3D profiles indicative of disease stability vs. progression. Citation Format: Awe A. Julius, Adam Yan, Nidhi Shah, Klewes Ludger, Alexandra Kuzyk, Michael Xu, Ramy Boles, Jeff Saranchuk, Darrel Drachenberg, Sabine Mai. 3D nuclear telomeric signatures define circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and characterize CTC subpopulations in intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4308. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4308

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207