Joint admission control and resource allocation with GoS and QoS in LTE uplink
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, an admission control (AC) scheme is proposed for handling multiclass Grade of Service (GoS) and Quality of Service (QoS) in Uplink Long Term Evolution (LTE) systems. GoS requirement in conjunction with QoS has been seldom taken into account in previous admission control and resource allocation algorithms for LTE uplink. We propose a novel algorithm for handling the priorities while fulfilling the QoS objective of all granted requests. It corresponds to a solution that combines resource allocation and admission control properties to satisfy the GoS and QoS objectives. Call blocking probability, call outage probability, system capacity and number of effectively served requests are used as performance metrics. Numerical results show that it is possible to manage a priority scheme which satisfies the QoS constraints of all granted requests without any system capacity loss, when comparing to previous algorithms. Furthermore, the proposed AC algorithm gain, for the most sensitive traffic, can be around 20% over the reference AC algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it