Comparison between Protonation, Lithiation, and Argentination of 5-Oxazolones: A Study of a Key Intermediate in Gas-Phase Peptide Sequencing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Molecular orbital calculations at B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) are reported for bases 2-(aminomethyl)-5-oxazolone, 2-(aminomethyl)-4-methyl-5-oxazolone, 2-phenyl-5-oxazolone, and 2-phenyl-4 methyl-5-oxazolone and for the cations formed by protonation of these bases on their imino nitrogens. Structures and relative energies for isomers generated by protonation at each of the four heteroatoms of 2-(aminomethyl)-5-oxazolone are reported. Lithium and silver cations both add to 2-(aminomethyl)-5-oxazolone, but unlike the proton, they bind with two heteroatoms simultaneously. For both the lithiated and argentinated 2-(aminomethyl)-5-oxazolone cations the lowest energy isomers have the metal coordinated with the two nitrogen atoms. Proton affinities of these bases are in the range 217.0−221 kcal mol -1, with the methyl group at C 4 increasing the proton affinity by ∼3 kcal mol -1 . Single-point calculations were performed at MP4(fc)/6-311++G(2df,p)//B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) for 2-(aminomethyl)-5-oxazolone, diketopiperazine, glycine, and alanine and their conjugate acids. The proton affinities from this level of theory are lower by as much as 2.7 kcal mol -1 than those calculated at B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p). Enthalpies of formation calculated at B3LYP/6-31++G(d,p) from isodesmic reactions for glycine, alanine, and their conjugate acids are all within 1 kcal mol -1 of the experimental values, but those calculated at MP4 deviate by as much as 4.8 kcal mol -1 . Enthalpies of formation from atomization reactions at the MP4 level are in larger disagreement with experimental values.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".