In Human Leukemia Cells Ephrin-B–Induced Invasive Activity Is Supported by Lck and Is Associated with Reassembling of Lipid Raft Signaling Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteins of the ephrin-B group operate in nonlymphoid cells through the control of their migration and attachment, and are crucial for the development of the vascular, lymphatic, and nervous systems. Ephrin-B activity is deregulated in various nonlymphoid malignancies; however, their precise role in cancer has only started to be addressed. We show here that ephrin-B1, a member of the ephrin-B group, is expressed in pediatric T-cell leukemias, including leukemia cell line Jurkat. Treatment of Jurkat cells with ephrin-B-stimulating EphB3 enhances ephrin-B1 phosphorylation and induces its relocalization into lipid rafts. These events are mediated by the T lineage-specific kinase, Lck, as ephrin-B1 phosphorylation and lipid raft association are blocked in the Lck-deficient clone of Jurkat, JCAM1.6. Ephrin-B1 also induces colocalization of the CrkL and Rac1 cytoskeleton regulators and initiates in leukemic cells a strong repulsive response. The absence of Lck blocks ephrin-B1-induced signaling and repulsion, confirming the essential role for Lck in ephrin-B1-mediated responses. This shows a new role for ephrin-B1 in the regulation of leukemic cells through the Lck-dependent Rac1 colocalization with its signaling partner, CrkL, in lipid rafts. In agreement with its repulsive action, ephrin-B1 seems to support metastatic properties of leukemic cells, as suppression of ephrin-B1 signaling inhibits their invasiveness. Because ephrin-B1-activating EphB proteins are ubiquitously expressed, our findings suggest that ephrin-B1 is likely to play an important role in the regulation of malignant T lymphocytes through the control of lipid-raft-associated signaling, adhesion, and invasive activity, and therefore may represent a novel target for cancer treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".