Mechanisms mediating sodium-induced pressor responses in the PVN of Dahl rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intracerebroventricular infusion of Na(+)-rich artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) causes larger sympathetic and pressor responses in Dahl salt-sensitive (S) than -resistant (R) or Wistar rats. Enhanced activity of the aldosterone-"ouabain" pathway or decreased nitric oxide (NO) release may contribute to this enhanced responsiveness. Where in the brain these mechanisms interact is largely unknown. The present study evaluated whether Na(+) in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) causes larger pressor responses in Dahl S (SS/Mcw) than R (Dahl SS.BN13) rats and whether mineralocorticoid receptors, benzamil-blockable Na(+) channels, "ouabain," angiotensin type 1 receptors, or NO mediates these enhanced responses. Na(+)-rich aCSF in the PVN caused 30-40% larger increases in blood pressure and heart rate in Dahl S than R or Wistar rats, whereas responses to ouabain, ANG II, or N(ω)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (l-NAME) in the PVN were the same. These responses to Na(+) were not affected by eplerenone, benzamil, or Fab fragments, whereas they were fully blocked by losartan, in Dahl S and R rats. l-NAME enhanced them more in Dahl R than S rats, thereby equalizing the responses in the two strains. Pressor responses to l-NAME in the PVN were attenuated by a high-salt diet in Dahl S, but not R, rats. The results indicate that acute and chronic increases in Na(+) concentration in the PVN inhibit NO release in the PVN of Dahl S, but not R, rats, thereby contributing to the enhanced pressor responses to Na(+) in Dahl S rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".