Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An adaptive motion/force control based approach is proposed for the bilateral teleoperation systems under both position and rate control with arbitrary motion/force scaling. The master and the slave are treated separately, and are subject to independent adaptive motion/force control. A model of the human operator is incorporated into the dynamics of the master robot, while a model of the environment is incorporated into the dynamics of the slave robot. Position/velocity tracking errors between the master and slave robots are shown to be in L/sub 2//spl cap/L/sub /spl infin//. The overall teleoperation system is equivalent to a free-floating mass plus a linear damper specified by the control and scaling parameters only. In comparison to previous teleoperation approaches, this approach possesses three novel features: 1) it is L/sub 2/ and L/sub /spl infin// stability guaranteed with motion/force tracking capability, 2) it can handle parameter uncertainties by applying independent parameter adaptation, and 3) it takes into account the full nonlinear dynamics of the master/slave robots. The validity of the theoretical results are verified by experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it