DNA Damage Recognition in the Rat Zygote Following Chronic Paternal Cyclophosphamide Exposure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The detrimental effects of preconceptional paternal exposure to the alkylating anticancer agent, cyclophosphamide, include aberrant epigenetic programming, dysregulated zygotic gene activation, and abnormalities in the offspring that are transmitted to the next generation. The adverse developmental consequences of genomic instabilities transmitted via the spermatozoon emphasize the need to elucidate the mechanisms by which the early embryo recognizes DNA damage in the paternal genome. Little information exists on DNA damage detection in the zygote. We assessed the impact of paternal cyclophosphamide exposure on phosphorylated H2AX (gammaH2AX) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(PARP-1), biomarkers of DNA damage, to determine the capacity in the rat zygote to recognize genomic damage and initiate a response to DNA lesions. An amplified biphasic gammaH2AX response was triggered in the paternal pronucleus in zygotes sired by drug-treated males; the maternal genome was not affected. PARP-1 immunoreactivity was substantially elevated in both parental genomes, coincident with the second phase of gammaH2AX induction in embryos sired by cyclophosphamide-exposed spermatozoa. Thus, paternal exposure to a DNA damaging agent rapidly activates signals implemental for DNA damage recognition in the zygote. Inefficient repair of DNA lesions may lead to persistent alterations of the histone code and chromatin integrity, resulting in aberrant embryogenesis. We propose that the response of the early embryo to disturbances in spermatozoal genomic integrity plays a vital role in determining its outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".