Small Molecule Activation by POCOP‐Nickel Complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This contribution describes the reactivities of CO2 , CO, O2 , and ArNC with the pincer-type complexes [(κ(P) ,κ(C) ,κ(P') -POC sp 3OP)NiX] (POC sp 3OP=(R2 POCH2 )2 CH; R=iPr; X=OSiMe3 , NArH; Ar=2,6-iPr2 C6 H3 ). Reaction of the amido derivative with CO2 and CO leads to a simple insertion into the NiN bond to give stable carbamate and carbamoyl derivatives, respectively, the pincer ligand backbone remaining intact in both cases. In contrast, the analogous reactions with the siloxide derivative produced kinetically labile insertion products that either revert to the starting material (in the case of CO2 ) or react further to give the mixed-valent, dinickel species [(POC sp 3OP)Ni(II) {μ,κ(O) ,κ(P) ,κ(P') -OCOCH(CH2 CH2 OPR2 )2 }Ni(0) (CO)2 ]. The zero-valent center in the latter compound is ligated by a new ligand arising from transformation of the POC sp 3OP ligand backbone. The carbonylation and carboxylation of the siloxido derivative also produced minor quantities of a side-product identified as the trinickel species, [{(η(3) -allyl)Ni(μ(O) ,κ(P) -R2 PO)2 }2 Ni], arising from total dismantling of the POC sp 3OP ligand. Similar reactivities were observed with isonitrile, ArNC: reaction with the siloxido derivative resulted in a complex sequence of steps involving initial insertion, a 1,3-hydrogen shift, and an Arbuzov rearrangement to give [Ni(CNAr)4 ] and a methacrylamide based on fragments of the POC sp 3OP ligand. Oxygenation of the amido and siloxido derivatives led to the phosphinate derivative, [(POC sp 3OP)Ni(OP(O)R2 )], arising from oxidative transformation of the original ligand frame; the reaction with the Ni-NHAr derivative also gave ArHNP(O)R2 through a complex NP bond-forming reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".