MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156668142 · doi:10.4271/2006-01-3169

Evaluation of Alternatives to Electrodeposited Cadmium for Threaded Fastener Applications

2006· article· en· W2156668142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lingqiu Zeng, E. Monserratt, Luke Haylock, R. H. Gurrola, Don Youngblood, C. J. Brown, Mark W. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCorrosion Behavior and Inhibition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFastenerComputer scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cadmium (Cd) plating offers good corrosion resistance, lubricity, solderability, adhesion, and ductility, as well as consistent torque-tension and uniform thickness on components with complex geometries. However, the intrinsic Environmental, Health, and Safety issues associated with Cd have driven many users to seek alternatives. Currently, various Cd replacement teams/programs such as the Joint Group on Pollution Prevention (JG-PP)/Boeing, the Joint Cadmium Alternatives Team (JCAT), the Canadian Cadmium Replacement Program (CCRP), and the REFOCUS Program (AEA Technology, European) have been investigating alternatives to Cd plating. Some of the current coatings being considered in the aerospace industry include Zn-Ni alloy plating, electrodeposited aluminum, electroless nickel, nickel composite, and molten salt aluminum manganese (Al-Mn). Each option has its own particular characteristics; however, most experiments have been conducted on aerospace structural panels or components. There is a need to evaluate various alternative coatings for complex geometries such as threaded fasteners. To this end, Lockheed Martin Aeronautics and Alcoa Fastening Systems have teamed to evaluate Cd alternatives for threaded fasteners used in the inlet of F-16 aircraft. One F-16 manufacturing process generates Cd dust from the fastener heads during sanding. The United States Air Force has funded Lockheed Martin Aeronautics to qualify a replacement for the Cd. The primary fasteners in question are NAS 1580 and NAS 4452 fasteners. Four candidate coatings were selected for evaluation: electroless nickel (EN), electroless nickel composite (EN-PTFE), electrodeposited surface mineralization based zinc-nickel (Zn-Ni), and electroplated aluminum (Al). Stress corrosion, salt spray (fog) tests, torque-tension relationship, locking and breakaway torque measurements, and push-in and interference tests were used to evaluate alternatives to Cd coatings used for corrosion protection and lubricity on threaded parts. For comparison, Cd plated fasteners were tested at equivalent conditions as the controls. Testing results showed that the surface mineralization based Zn-Ni coating best seems to mimic the overall characteristics of fasteners coated with cadmium. However, no one coating appears to offer the same broad range of properties as Cd plating. Salt spray tests indicated that EN and EN-PTFE exhibited red rust after 96 hours exposure. However, EN-PTFE demonstrated the best coefficient of friction feature, having the least overall torque to achieve the required tension. During torque tension tests, Zn-Ni performed nearly as well as Cd plating. Locking and break-away tests showed that Zn-Ni, EN-PTFE, and Cd nut/bolt sets meet the specification requirements. Al, Zn-Ni, and Cd showed acceptable resistance to stress corrosion up to 400 hours. However, only Al passed the 587 hours consistent load stress corrosion tests. Push-in tests revealed Cd plating required the minimum load to insert fasteners into aluminum structure with interference, followed by Zn-Ni. Furthermore, cross-sectional metallurgical examinations and interference tests were conducted to evaluate coating characteristics and adhesion strength between substrate and coating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicCorrosion Behavior and InhibitionFrench-language works237,207