Left ventriculoplasty for ischemic cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In order to treat ischemic cardiomyopathy, which is defined as non-aneurysmal diffuse akinetic left ventricle with chronic heart failure following myocardial infarction, the mid-term effect of the endoventricular circular patch plasty (EVCPP) was studied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EVCPP has been performed on 54 patients (46 men and eight women with a mean age of 61 years) during 4 years from March 1997 to December 2000. Thirty-two patients (59%) were NYHA class III and 22 patients (41%) were class IV. Nine patients (17%) had mild angina pectoris before the operation but others had no chest pain. Single, double, triple, and left main disease were noted in six, 13, 32, and three patients, respectively. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 23.3 +/- 6.3% (6--30%). Coronary artery bypass grafting was concomitantly undergone by 51 patients (94%) and mitral valve reconstruction was done on 19 patients (35%). RESULTS: Two patients (3.7%) needed an intra-aortic balloon pump to wean from cardiopulmonary bypass. Seven patients (12.9%) died in the hospital. Among them, two patients (4.4%) out of 45 patients who underwent elective operation died of stroke and heart failure. Five patients (55.5%) out of nine patients who required emergency operation died of heart failure and multiorgan failure. Late death occurred in six patients (11.1%) due to arrhythmia and heart failure in each of three patients. Out of 41 survivors, 38 patients returned to NYHA class I or II and three patients to class III. Out of 50 patients who underwent left ventricular study before and after operation, ejection fraction increased from 22.8 +/- 6.6 to 36.2 +/- 8.0% and mean left ventricular end-diastolic volume and left ventricular end-systolic volume indices reduced from 152.8 +/- 24.6 to 105.0 +/- 36.5 and from 113.6 +/- 45.7 to 66.4 +/- 28.4 ml/m(2), respectively. Mean pulmonary wedge pressure decreased from 19.1 +/- 8.8 to 14.9 +/- 6.8 mmHg. One-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial survival rates were 87.9, 82.7 and 77.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Left ventriculoplasty using EVCPP is effective to exclude the akinetic LV segment, and left ventricular function and clinical status improve in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".