MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156698342 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00258.2013

Strong linear relationship between heart rate and mean pulmonary artery pressure in exercising patients with severe precapillary pulmonary hypertension

2013· article· en· W2156698342 on OpenAlexaff
D. S. Chemla, Vincent Castelain, Susana Hoette, Nicolas Creuzé, Steeve Provencher, Kaixian Zhu, Marc Humbert, Philippe Hervé

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyPulmonary arteryInternal medicineSupine positionPulmonary hypertensionVascular resistanceHemodynamicsCardiac outputStroke volumeHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contribution of heart rate (HR) to pulmonary artery hemodynamics has been suggested in pulmonary hypertension (PH). Our high-fidelity pressure, retrospective study tested the hypothesis that HR explained the majority of mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and pulse pressure (PApp) variation in 12 severe precapillary PH patients who performed incremental-load cycling while in the supine position. Seven idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension patients and five chronic thromboembolic PH patients were studied. Four to five PAP-thermodilution cardiac output (CO) points (mean: 4.4) were obtained. At rest, mPAP was 57 ± 9 mmHg, PApp was 51 ± 11 mmHg, HR was 90 ± 12 beats/min, and stroke volume (SV) was 50 ± 22 ml. At peak exercise, mPAP was 76 ± 10 mmHg, PApp was 67 ± 11 mmHg, and HR was 123 ± 18 beats/min (i.e., 71 ± 10% of maximum HR, each P < 0.05), whereas SV was 51 ± 20 ml (P = not significant). The input resistance did not change (mPAP/CO = 14.1 ± 4.1 vs. 13.5 ± 4.4 mmHg·min·l(-1)). The relative increase in mPAP was related to the relative increase in HR (n = 12, r(2) = 0.74) but not in CO. mPAP was linearly related to CO in 8 of 12 patients (median r(2) = 0.83) and to HR in 12 of 12 patients (median r(2) = 0.985). The parsimony principle favored the latter fit. PApp was linearly related to mPAP in 12 of 12 patients (median r(2) = 0.985), HR in 10 of 12 patients (median r(2) = 0.97), CO in 7 of 12 patients (median r(2) = 0.87), and SV in 1 of 12 patients. A strong linear relationship between HR and mPAP was consistently documented in severe precapillary PH patients who performed supine exercise. The limited value of thermodilution CO to predict mPAP could be explained by unavoidable precision errors in CO measurements, unchanged/decreased SV on exercise, curvilinearity of the mPAP-CO relationship at high flow, or flow-independent additional mechanisms increasing mPAP on exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207