MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2156739368 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab266

266 ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY OF BOAR SEMINAL PLASMA

2004· article· en· W2156739368 on OpenAlex
Marta Hernández, Antonio Caño, Marino B. Arnao, Xiomara Lucas, J.M. Vázquez, Esmeralda Martinez, J. Roca

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesCanada Research ChairsSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
KeywordsBOARSpermTroloxAntioxidantSemenAndrologyAntioxidant capacityCentrifugationChemistryOxidative stressAnimal scienceBiologyChromatographyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been established that antioxidants in seminal plasma play an important role in protecting the spermatozoa against oxidative stress-induced damage. This study was conducted to measure the total antioxidant capacity (TAC) of boar seminal plasma. Fifty-four ejaculates were collected from 17 mature boars of proven fertility by the gloved-hand technique. Ejaculates were collected separately in different fractions (pre-sperm, sperm-rich, and post-sperm) according to their macroscopic (color) characteristics. After centrifugation (2400g for 3 min), the sperm pellet was discarded; the supernatant was recentrifuged and filtered through a 10-µm nylon mesh filter to remove debris or clumped spermatozoa. The seminal plasma was frozen at -20°C until further use. After thawing at room temperature, seminal plasma aliquots of 5 µL were immediately assessed for total antioxidant capacity. TAC was measured using the ABTS/H2O2/HRP decoloration method (Cano A et al. 2000 Redox Report 5, 365–370) which allows differentiation between hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidant activity capacity. TAC units were expressed as micromolar (µM) Trolox equivalents. Data were analyzed using ANOVA. Only the hydrophilic activity was measurable, with the lipophilic activity being undetected. The overall TAC of seminal samples (mean ± SEM) was 1623.7 ± 56.28 µM, ranging from 674 to 2428 µM. Different TACs were observed among males (P < 0.05) and between ejaculates of the same male (P < 0.05). Ejaculate fraction had a significant effect (P < 0.001) on the TAC levels. The post-sperm fraction had a significantly lower TAC level (1104.09 ± 57.66 µM) than the pre-sperm and sperm-rich fractions (1611.95 ± 153.68 µM and 1356.136 ± 72.47 µM, respectively, P < 0.001). In conclusion, hydrophilic antioxidant activity represented the main contribution to the TAC in boar seminal plasma, showing differences among males, between ejaculates of the same male, and also between the different ejaculate fractions. This work was supported by CICYT (AGF98-0533; AGL01-0471) and INIA (RZ01-019).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.244
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it