Bibliographic record
Abstract
We are very pleased to welcome you to the 16th Science of Aphasia conference, being held from September 17 till September 22, 2015 at the University of Aveiro in Portugal. The 2015 program theme is: Neuroplasticity and Language. Invited speakers are: Argye Hillis (Johns Hopkins University, USA), Hugues Duffau (CHU Montpellier, France), Cathy Price (UCL, UK), Alexandre Castro Caldas (UCP, Portugal), Alexandra Reis (UAlg, Portugal), Uri Hasson (Universita Degli Studi di Trento, Italy), Jenny Crinion (UCL, UK), Brenda Rapp (Johns Hopkins University, USA), David Poeppel (Max Planck Institute, Germany), Dan Bub (University of Victoria, Canada), and David Caplan (Harvard Medical School, USA). The SoA conferences are intended to bring together senior and junior scientists working in the multidisciplinary field Neurocognition of language and to deal with normal function as well as disorders. The size of the conference has a maximum of about 150 participants to ensure direct interaction between the participants. The focus of this year’s conference is on Neuroplasticity and Language.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".