Experimental comparison between autofluorescence spectra of constrained fresh and cryopreserved arteries.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of mechanical properties of the arterial wall is an important step in the comprehension of the vascular physiopathological functioning. However, cryopreserving biological tissues using very low temperatures can induce biological and structural modifications which may involve complications (dilatation, bursting, stenosis) after reimplantation. Many procedures of mechanical tests (traction, dilatation) developed in research allow us to comprehend and analyse rheological behaviour of the arterial wall. The study presented in this article offers a new perspective to detect changes of mechanical properties of cryopreserved arterial samples. In fact, the original idea is to couple a mechanical test bed (uniaxial traction of arterial rings) with spectroscopic measurements (autofluorescence) for the purpose of correlating mechanical modifications and spectral variations. Ultimately, this new approach could lead to develop a device allowing atraumatic and contactless optical examinations of arterial graft to determine its mechanical state before reimplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".